TRUE BELIEVER NOTICE:
THIS IS NOT A “THEORY”, THIS IS AN INFERENCE BASED ON AVAILABLE EVIDENCE
Jade Helm is a part of a larger military scheme that was included in the 2014 NDAA Budget. (The NDAA Budget is the National Defense Authorization Act that funds the US military). This operation covering Jade Helm is the largest one for involving military operations. Sit rep Phase 0 is about identifying potential threats. Its funding is found in the following part of the budget:
Section 1074—Pilot Program for the Human Terrain System. This section would require the Secretary of the Army to conduct. a pilot program to utilize Human Terrain System assets in the U.S. Pacific Command area of responsibility to support Phase 0 shaping operations and to support the theater security cooperation plans of the geographic combatant commander.
Phase 0 gets disproportionately the most funding. In combat operations there’s usually 5 phases of combat. However, Phase 0 operations is relatively new. The NDAA 2014 Budget provides for increasing the budget for phase 0 operation. Here are some of the corporations participating:
Phase 0 operation involves employing infiltration techniques to identify who’ll be a problem before fighting even begins. This is why special ops dressed as civilians will be moving around in local populations. The cover story, Mark Lastoria, Army Special Operation Command spokesman gave the press and public meetings is that some Special Ops will be testing to see if they’ll be identified. The Psy-Op twist is that it is they who’ll be doing the identifying. They’ll be looking for individuals and groups who they assess as possible “non-state actors”. By “non-state actors” the Military includes people who support social unrest but are not participating in any disturbance. This falls under their definition of “Terrorist”. It was on these grounds Anwar al-Awlaki an American citizen noncombatant was targeted and murdered by a U.S. Drone. Another U.S. drone also murdered his son two weeks later
Identifying “terrorists” for later elimination is a primary objective of the opening “tickling phase” of a war. “Tickling” is a CIA concept that consists of using military force to excite the enemy and prompt him to respond. This was the rational behind the CIA’s demented tactic of using predator missiles to murder en mass innocent Pakistani citizens and therefore provoke retaliation by their relatives. By extracting these so-called “Terrorists” the Army thinks they’re severely limiting organized resistance. In so far as appropriations that included JADE HELM were approved in the NDAA budget at a Phase 0 sit rep, this is what JADE Helm is all about. It also bears an insidious Psy-ops twist: First, by extracting these trumped up “terrorist”, they hope to generate mutual distrust within hostile organizations. Second, people who show up to protest will be added to the extraction list. As we’ve mentioned Lastoria story is that that the “exercise” is for overseas, but zero phase requires the operation occur at a specific place and due to the nature of Net Centric warfare the place must be specific to where the ops takes place? So we’re talking about U.S. soil.
(Phase 1) – the run-up to hostilities – Deter. The intent of this phase is to deter
undesirable adversary action by demonstrating the capabilities and resolve of the joint force. It includes activities to prepare forces and set conditions for deployment and employment of forces in the event that deterrence is not successful.
(Phase 2) – the onset of military action – Seize Initiative. Joint Force Capabilities seek to seize the initiative through the application of appropriate JFC’s
(Phase 3) – major combat – Dominate. The dominate phase focuses on breaking the enemy’s will for organized resistance or, in non combat situations, control of the operational environment.
(Phase 4) – “post-conflict” stabilization – Stabilize. The stabilize phase is required when there is no fully functional, legitimate civil governing authority present. The joint force may be required to perform limited local governance, integrating the efforts of other supporting/ contributing multinational, IGO, NGO, or USG department and agency participants until legitimate local entities are functioning.
(Phase 5) – the shift to civilian control – Enable Civil Authority. This phase is
predominantly characterized by joint force support to legitimate civil governance in theater. The goal is for the joint force to enable the viability of the civil authority and its provision of essential services to the largest number of people in the region.
Within the last three years or so, the military has been operating/training on civilian soil. A lot of it has involved flying helicopter gun ships into large cities and firing blanks with machine guns. It’s reported that there’s a quick turnover rate of participants engaged in these operations. That means the military has already trained a lot of people. It follows that there must be something they’re planning on in the not too distant future.
Now what would worry the government about civil unrest to this degree? Why would the Federal Government have to be breaking into its own citizens homes and taking mom or dad away in the middle of the night like the CIA Death Squads did in Iran, after the U.S. installed a puppet Shah? What could possibly be a legitimate reason for such extremes? There’s no Constitutionally legitimate reason. One can imagine a scenario in which the monetary system collapses and everyone’s money becomes worthless. There would be people very upset with the system and the danger of civil disturbances and instability would spike. This is possible, but it implies a foreknowledge on the part of the Federal government beyond our keen to speculate. However, in 2008 after the economic meltdown, the U.S. government made no secret of its intent to plant armed troops on American soil and the Pentagon announced that 20,000 uniformed troops would be stationed inside the U.S. by 2011, to help bolster domestic security and assist state and local authorities in responding to terrorist attacks. At the time, Paul McHale, then-assistant defense secretary for homeland defense, said that this sevenfold increase in domestic troop strength marked a “fundamental change in military culture” that “would have been extraordinary to the point of unbelievable” prior to the events of September 11, 2001. That same year the U.S. Army War College Strategic Studies Institute warned the U.S. government that it was being too complacent to domestic threats and encouraged the Department of Defense to play a more active role in homeland security. “Widespread civil violence inside the United States would force the defense establishment to reorient priorities in extremis to defend basic domestic order and human security,” Lieutenant Colonel Nathan Freir wrote and went on to say that the “DOD might be forced by circumstances to put its broad resources at the disposal of civil authorities to contain and reverse violent threats to domestic tranquility. Under the most extreme circumstances, this might include use of military force against hostile groups inside the United States.”
In an article in the New York Times, titled “US Defense Department organizing covert operations against the general public”, November 19th, 2014, Thomas Gaist reported that the Department of Defense is developing domestic espionage and covert operations targeting “the general public” in coordination with the intelligence establishment and police agencies. Gaist’s analysis showed that the “military and its investigative agencies have almost as many undercover agents working inside the United States as the FBI…While most of them are involved in internal policing of service members and defense contractors, a growing number are focused in part, on part of joint federal task forces that include military intelligence and law enforcement specialist.”
Phase 0 is where the fabled “Red List” comes into play with the information provided from JADE, the artificial intelligence, operating banks of the DOD’s super quantum computers. It will provide the whereabouts of each individual defined as a non-state actor/”terrorist”, with a little flag on its holographic projection of the battle space. The victims will, of course, be identified as “militants” in the corporate media. The story from the military will be that the victims demonstrated willingness to take-up arms and resist the authority of the Federal Government. For now, these future victims are still just simple folk facing a low-level invasion, and haven’t yet made a conscious decision to resist. This is how the war against terrorism works. Probably the best thing to do, for any community, having to put up with this two month imposition, is simply see nothing, say nothing, write nothing, and just go about living normal lives. Eventually, the boys will pick up their toys and go home claiming to have had a nice exercise.
The function of “Terrorism” for the Late Modern Imperial State is analogous to the function of the “Devil” for the Papacy in the Middle Ages. A “non-state actor” has an operational role akin to “Heretic” with the Catholic Church. “Heresy” comes from the Latin meaning “To chose”. Just as “Satan” empowered the empire of the Roman Church, so “Terrorism” empowers the empire of the United States Inc. One need not do devilish things to be in the employ of Satan, it’s only necessary to speak heretical things. In a similar manner, for the America Inc. empire, whoever says things that allegedly causes social instability, is a “terrorist.” Civilians who resist invasion, as well, are classified as “terrorists”, just as those who resisted Papal troops were enemies of God. It’s the nature of pys-war (psychological warfare) that each small operation builds upon the previous one like an inverted pyramid, so all the building blocks rest upon one original faulty foundation stone. In the case of the global war on terror, everything rests upon the U.S. government’s use of the vague, ambiguous and ill-defined word “terrorism”, just as everything rested on the Papacy’s use of the vague, ambiguous and ill defined word “Devil.”
In 2008 the DOD also initiated the Minerva Initiative. It partnered with universities in a variety of projects “to improve DOD’s basic understanding of the social, cultural, behavioral, and political forces that shape regions of strategic importance in the world to the US.” While the idea of the DOD being interested in “culture” may sound something like a joke, there was big money in it for the universities. So, Cornell University, for instance, led a study, managed by the US Air Force Office of Scientific Research. Its aim was to develop a model “of the dynamics of social movement mobilization and contagions.” The Pentagon and Cornell hoped they would be able to determine “the critical mass (tipping point)” of social contagions by studying “digital traces” for instance “the 2011 Egyptian revolution, the 2011 Russian Duma elections, the 2012 Nigerian fuel subsidy crisis and the 2013 Gazi park protests in Turkey. “The study and program looks at Twitter and Face book posts and conversations in order “to identify individuals mobilized in a social contagion and when they become mobilized.” Note here the use of the word “contagions”. This word suggests an infection or virus. By talking about social movements as if they’re diseases, the DOD is putting a spin on the conclusion in advance of the research. This tweaking of the conclusion in advance of the research could be done in like manner had the Papacy asked a university to help it develop a model of the dynamics of social movements and the spread of evil. The idea is that any social movement challenging Imperial authority is a “disease” is no different than claiming its the work of the devil. “Terrorism” like “Evil” can be contagious and spread, so it must be stamped out before an epidemic occurs. The DOD’s Minerva Initiative funded another project in 2012 to determine “Who Does Not Become a Terrorist, and Why?” In this study, the DOD conflates peaceful activists with “supporters of political violence”. We read the following: “In every context we find many individuals who share the demographic, family, cultural, and/or socioeconomic background of those who decide to engage in terrorism, and yet refrained themselves from taking up armed militancy, even though they were sympathetic to the end goals of armed groups. The field of terrorism studies has not, until recently, attempted to look at this control group. This project is not about terrorists, but about supporters of political violence.” Okay, what’s the difference between this and saying that people who support the works of the devil are committing sin just as much as the ones who actually do the devils work? Once again, the DOD’s pseudo scientific objectivity can’t hide the fact that its manner of framing the problem insures the desired spin in the results of its “research”.
The DOD’s choice of words clearly reflects a military in denial of the imperial role it presumes. Hence, it feigns objectivity by carefully selecting a language that its spinners trust gives the appearance of “science.” However, the imperial aim, for which the DOD serves as enforcer, has an authoritarian, monocultural agenda. This absurd paradox is underscored by its Marvel Comics mottoes like “Masters of the Human Domain”. Frank Lloyd Wright once remarked that some people are schooled but not educated and other people are educated but not schooled. Of course, some people are both, but once one reads the DOD literature regarding how Special Ops are supposed to “Master the Human Domain”, it’s abundantly clear that none of their commanders are educated and few are schooled beyond what one might pick up at San Quentin after a few years. Thus the DOD boasts that its Special Ops will display their cultural sensitivity by approaching healthy social dialog by intellectuals as a “Contest of wills” between it and the other participants. In any such contest they crow, they’ll surely dominate by being the first to murder all the other contestants. It doesn’t matter how many stars and bars, medals and fringe they wear on their neatly pressed brown apparel, anyone who sees the process of democracy as a war to be won by any means necessary, bears the low grade mentality of a thug. Of course these “Masters of the human domain” have an excuse for murdering the present participants in an ongoing social dialog that students of humanity have carried on for thousands of years: “They’ll be extracted”, they say, “because they’re provoking ‘social instability.’” It’s a grave misfortune that these dimwits have never realized that in civilized society’s ongoing democratic dialog, it’s the cause of social instability that’s always at issue! The joke is, no dialog over the causes of social instability is ever resolved by assassinating the participants in the dialog. Like tickling, it only insures the wholesale slaughter of more and more innocent people, the very people from which the Military itself has sprung. Certainly the only real terrorist in the whole human domain thing is the Department of Defense; otherwise the word “terrorism” has absolutely no meaning. Instead of doing the appropriate job of a military in a free democracy, or a democratic republic, i.e. support the Constitution while the dialog of a free people proceeds to weed out the causes of their nations social instability. On the contrary, the U.S. Department of Defense assumes the preposterous posture of enforcer of social instability, on behalf of its corporate criminal sponsors, by eliminating the dialog, while all the while pretending its doing a noble thing. All things being equal, the DOD alone will some day stand atop the rubble and ruins of what once was a pretty cool planet.
Part 1 JADE HELM The Empires New Clothes