Friday, August 17, 2018

Image From

The thrust of yesterday’s article assumed that Putin would send troops into Syria in support of the Assad government. Of course all Moscow committed to was air support.

Air support may buy Assad a bit of time, but it, in and of itself will not and cannot be a game changer. That can only happen with boots on the ground.  And in fact by bombing ISIS positions, (as opposed to saying they are bombing ISIS positions as the US- France and Turkey does), it is only likely to strengthen ISIS all the more.

It will act as a powerful recruitment campaign for new ISIS fighters. And it is likely that the Gulf States will react by increasing funding and Erdogan by increasing material and logistical support.

The only real game changer that can be made in the Levant would be the introduction of Russian troops.

It still holds true, that in the Levant war there can be no winner. All that can come about is a negotiated peace through Balkinization of the region, or for the area to fall into chaos as per Libya.  Russian troops in Syria will encourage a political agreement. Bombing will accomplish next to nothing.

Putin is only beginning his bombing campaign because Assad’s troops are tiring and his military position is eroding. Bombing alone will not change this. So the assumption is that if Moscow is serious about saving Assad, (which will encourage a political solution) it will have to sooner rather than later introduce troops.

Image From

There have been no new news articles on Red Pills because there has been no real news for a very long time. Pretty much everything that has been happening globally is an extension of analysis made in past articles.

For those who want to understand the macro picture around them all they need do is read those articles.

The Iran “nuclear” agreement with the US was a small piece of news. As Red Pill readers know the agreement had little to do with nuclear. It was mostly about creating a comprehensive agreement with Tehran on its position relative to Cold War 2, which Obama had previously declared against Russia and China.

Would Iran move into the Western camp or at least stay non- aligned in this Cold War that we are only in the very early stages of?

From a US standpoint it seems as if ruling elites are divided on Iran. The majority, as represented by all Republican presidential candidates as well as Hillary Clinton on the Democratic side favor a hot war with Iran.

Obama’s peace agreement was intended to make it more difficult for these people to start such a war after he leaves the White House. It is arguably the only truly peaceful thing Obama has done in his more than six years as US president.

Of course getting around the Iran agreement is as simple as Hillary’s statement to the Brookings Institution that she would support the deal UNTIL she determined that Tehran was in violation and then she would attack.

Ostensibly she would learn that Tehran was in “violation” of the agreement by using the same Intel operatives who determined that Saddam had WMD and that Assad used chemical weapons at Ghouta.

Until now Tehran has not become a part of the new Russia- China defense system for a host of reasons, most of them rooted in history.

And until now while both Putin and Khamenei, (Iran’s supreme leader) have helped Assad in Syria, there has been limited coordination as well as assistance.

This is all about to change. Obviously long in the planning, Moscow has finally decided to enter the fray, with Beijing as always now quietly taking its back.

Putin is making the very high-risk move of committing Russian troops to support Assad and the Syrian government. The downside for Russia could mean its soldiers being caught in a political, cultural, tribal and religious swamp in Syria and perhaps Iraq as they once had been in Afghanistan.

But apparently Geo Political strategists in Moscow believed that this gamble would be worth it. For starters it opens the door to Tehran for much closer cooperation, first within the Levant and then in a growing partnership with Russia and China.

This also puts the Hillary Clinton’s and Jeb Bush’s in the US on notice that an unprovoked attack against Iran, (based on Empire“Intel” that it is building a nuclear weapon) is likely to, as Obama loves to say have “consequences”.

Thirdly this throws Russia and China’s hat into the ring to let Washington- Ankara- Riyadh- Tel Aviv- Paris- London etc. understand that they are no longer going to have their way in the MENA, creating terrorist mercenary groups like ISIS and Al Nusra to informally prosecute the West’s regional agendas.

This gives Putin a massive propaganda advantage, which he is well availing himself of. Since none other than the Empire has defined ISIS as the most dastardly of evil “terrorists” as well as the fiction that the “terrorist” group Al Qaeda was behind 9/11, then fighting them in Syria is fighting terrorism by the West’s own standard.

This is the kind of simplistic rhetoric that Westerners particularly Americans understand.

“Are you for us or against us? Are you for terrorism or against it? If you are against it, then why are you not joining us in fighting the “terrorists” (who in reality we all know wink wink you created and support to this day)?”

It is calling the bluff of Obama. Hollande, Cameron, Erdogan. Salman, Netanyahu et al.

The creation of ISIS, Al Qaeda and Washington’s aggression that led to the wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya and Yemen were not done accidentally either.

Just because Russia- China and Iran are entering the fray in the Levant more directly, is unlikely to change regional policy goals for Washington.

The Americans and their vassals are going to have to appear as if they want peace in the region and that they oppose ISIS and Al Nusra, while of course continuing to support them.

And continuing to support them they will, no matter how many fake “bombing” missions of terrorist positions they will claim to make.

Washington’s response to Putin entering the war in Syria will be “fine let the Russians die there”. And in order to accomplish that the US and its vassals will redouble the arms they give, (through Turkey) to ISIS and Al Nusra, as well as expand the funding for them through their Gulf State bankers.

The challenge for Washington is that they are now going to have to soften their rhetoric against their very own “terrorists” in general and ISIS in particular. They will need to give them a propaganda makeover. Washington has begun to do that with Al Qaeda, (which it actively supports today in Yemen) anyway. Soon all of us who read and understand English and other Western languages will learn that ISIS was never all that bad after all.

Also as Tehran expands into the Levant militarily, (albeit with the help of an awakened bear to the north) sectarian polarization between Sunnis and Sh’ias will increase.

The war will act as a huge recruitment campaign among young Sunnis for ISIS, especially if the funding spigots from Riyadh and Qatar are opened even further.

Meanwhile the back room agreements between Washington and Tehran, that has ruled over Baghdad since the Americans withdrew in numbers from Iraq seems once again ready to collapse. Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi has agreed to share intel with Russia on ISIS operations in his country.

That means that Tehran has given Haider a green light to cooperate with Moscow. That is directly against Washington’s regional interests, interests that Haider was supposed to represent as well.

It is a direct slap in Obama’s face.

How far and how deep Russia involves itself in the region remains to be seen. Of Russia’s population of 30 million Muslims, the largest group are Sunnis. For them Moscow is going to be on the wrong side of the Levant wars.

The people of Syria are caught between the devil and the deep blue sea. If Assad were to fall, (as Putin stated) Syria will become a failed state. On the other hand, is that worse than a war that will grow more widespread and ever more sectarian?

And to the degree that Putin lends Russian (Chinese) military support for regional Sh’ias and the West counters by supporting regional Sunnis, this will open a third front in Cold War 2.

The Levant will add to the fronts in the Ukraine (NATO expansion in Eastern Europe) as well as US naval expansion in the China and South China Seas, both of which are being met with a massive expansion of Russian and Chinese defense and counterattack capabilities.

There is a difference in Syria to the other two Cold War fronts which came about due to Washington’s aggression. Up until now the Levant and much of the rest of the region had been Washington’s de facto play ground, for the creation of terrorist assets as well as regional chaos. Except in Chechnya, American policies have only impacted Russia at the margins.

So Putin’s military entrance into the Levant is, (much more than the Crimea) an overtly aggressive move. And Washington and all its vassal states have been rocked back on their heels by it.

While it is possible that Putin won’t go too far militarily, usually actions like this have one or more specific goals. And one has to use whatever assets are necessary, (including time) in order to achieve them. That is why military incursions far from home tend to be like quicksand, easy to enter and hard to get out of. Be assured that Washington will use this principle in counterattacking.

Unlike the far more dangerous regions of Eastern Europe and the Eastern and Southeastern Pacific, there is a relatively easy outline for a Great Power peace accord in the Levant. That is because the goal of Washington in the region has long since been to Balkanize it into tiny hostile states mostly along sectarian lines.

At this point that would suit Russia, China and even Iran just fine. The question is how will this new map look? And that is what this war in the Levant is going to be about.

Any peace accord in the Levant however, is still a long way off. This war, as a new front in Cold War 2 is just beginning.

1 1699
Photo From

Politicians and betrayals are synonyms. There are however little betrayals and great betrayals. The greatest betrayal of a major modern politician had been that of Tony Blair, who single handedly destroyed the once grand Labor Party of the UK. Working people in the UK rightfully no longer believe that Labor represents them. Today they have no voice.

But Blair’s betrayal of the British people is absolutely nothing compared to what Alexis Tsipras has just done. Not only is it a dagger in the heart to the Greek people, but to truly progressive people throughout Europe, (like those who support Podemos in Spain) and even to anti EU politicians coming from the right like Marine Le Pen and Nigel Farage.

Working people reeling under the pain and misery of the neo fascist banker takeover of Europe, (called the EU and the Euro Zone) now have to ask whether any politician who claims to represent them is anything other than a Tsipras; a liar and a fraud.

After the first February negotiations between newly elected Tsipras and the Eurozone, in which he seemed to be backing off his campaign promises to the Greek people of no more austerity, many believed that he was a traitor and a fake.

But these were minor negotiations and Tsipras, as well as his political party Syriza were new to power. In order to call the Euro Zones bluff that Greece would be cut off from any new funding and its economy would collapse, Tsipras had to put a plan in place to minimize any damage the Euro Zone could do. In February he hadn’t had the time to have done that.

The great negotiations were going to happen in June when Greece would owe more money to its creditors than it could pay. In order to blunt the Euro Zone’s threat of a complete cutoff of funding, Tsipras had to do two things. One was to create the capacity for a seamless transition of Greece’s monetary system from Euros to a New Drachma, that would be used for all business within the country.

Secondly Tsipras had to insure the convertibility of the new currency into Euros or dollars, as the EU and the Anglo 5 countries would do everything in their power to make it completely worthless outside of Greece. In order to do that Tsipras needed a country rich enough to backstop the New Drachma with dollars and euros. And only China could do that, although Beijing would probably want to work through the new BRICS bank.

It was in both the interests of Greece and China as well as Russia for this to happen. Here and here is why.

Once the New Drachma would be convertible, then Greek importers could buy what they need for the countries tourist, shipping, olive oil and other businesses and Greek Inc. would be back in business again. Greece would then be able to offer sun and sand vacation packages as well as olive oil at half the price Italy and Spain, (both burdened with the Euro) could have charged. Euros would have flooded back into Greece, the New Drachma would organically strengthen and the economy would normalize.

During the February to June period, while in negotiations with his Euro creditors, it would have been prudent for Tsipras to have laid the groundwork for all of this as quietly as possible, with negotiations with Beijing and Moscow being held behind closed doors.

So it would have been unlikely that anyone would have known whether Tsipras had been doing his homework or not . But the final test would come during the June negotiations which have now dragged on into July.

The mega Bankers have long since known that Greece was bankrupt and that their Greek debt portfolio was going to go up in smoke. So since 2010 they have offloaded that bad debt on synthetic institutions like the ECB, the IMF etc that are in the end only backed by the taxes of ordinary working Europeans, (and others). The bankers did this through their usual corrupt politicians who are supposed to represent the people’s of Northern and Central Europe, but in fact represent the banks.

By 2015 the bankers not only did not care whether Greece foreclosed on their debts, they actually wanted them to. Their voice among the Euro Zone “negotiators” was and is Wolfgang Schaeuble the German Finance Minister. He made it abundantly clear that he wanted Greece out of the Eurozone altogether and for the country to fall into ruin, with maximum suffering falling on its people.

The reason for that is that the Greek people were at the cutting edge and were the leading voices of a debtors rebellion that is presently going on throughout debt ridden Europe, mostly importantly in Spain and Italy. And those countries’ debts are still mostly held by the banks. If a populist political movement in those far larger countries were to take power and renounce their debts, the whole of Europe’s weak banking system would almost certainly collapse like a house of cards.

In 2010 in order to avoid this, the bankers first needed to surgically remove Greece from Europe, with minimum impact to themselves, (the offloading of Greek debt from their portfolios). Afterwards they would need to make an example out of the Greeks to insure that no one else would dare to risk their wrath.

For Greece to successfully foreclose on its debts, make a seamless transition into the New Drachma, be able to get the dollar based liquidity necessary so that the country would be able to stabilize its economy and thrive again, would have been a knife in the heart of the bankers and their proxy Euro politicians and bureaucrats.

That is because after Greece would renounce its debts and ordinary European working class people find out that they are left holding the bag, even the dumbest would figure out that this all happened because their politicians bought the toxic loan portfolio of Greece from the bankers and gave it to their national treasuries as an “asset”. Established political parties would be badly damaged or even fall, as Labor has done in the UK.

And a happy ending in Greece would embolden the debtor countries of Europe to rebel as well, which would finish Europe’s already weak banking system.

But what if Tsipras was a phony from day one, who only used his anti banker, anti austerity rhetoric to get elected and take power, but never had any intention of doing anything other than giving the Euro Zone group everything they wanted in the first place? In such a narrative Tsipras would have made no preparation for a transition into a New Drachma, nor would he have sought out China’s help in making it convertible.

In other words Tsipras would have built no safety net under the high wire act of these negotiations, so that if the Euro Zone would pull the plug on further Euro credits it would have meant total disaster for the Greek people. That would give him the excuse to capitulate to whatever demands they would make.

This would have been a mega cynics worst case scenario. But that it seems is exactly what has happened.

Tispris’s betrayal of the Greek people may be the single worst betrayal of any people from a major country, for at least the last 50 years. And it has widespread global implications that go well beyond economics to Geo Politics and Cold War 2, especially against Russia.

To Be Continued.

0 769
epa04603088 European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker (R) welcomes Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras prior to a meeting at the EU Commission headquarters in Brussels, Belgium, 04 February 2015. Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras arrived in Brussels on 04 February as part of his tour of European capitals to press their demands for debt relief. EPA/OLIVIER HOSLET

On the surface it should be very hard to be Alexis Tsipras or Yanis Varoufakis, (the Greek Prime Minister and Finance Minister). They are leading a bankrupt nation where no one, neither the people of the debtor nation, nor the creditors want to admit that Greece is indeed bankrupt.

The Finance Ministers of Germany and the Netherlands, (Wolfgang Schäuble and Jeroen Dijsselbloem) acting as if Greece is solvent, are playing hard ball. They have made it abundantly clear that they have no intention of compromising with Greece over their debt problems.

Before the Troika, (The EU, ECB and the IMF) will disperse new loans to keep Greece afloat, it wants the monies already owed, (no matter should it come out of the hides of the people) and they want more austerity, (further impoverishment) from the people going forward. This so the Troika can be assured that it will continue to get paid.

Meanwhile Tsipras is committed to ending austerity and insuring that the debts of the Greek government will firstly be paid to its own people and only then to its creditors. And Tsipras was elected in January to end austerity.

Since these elections, no poll has asked the Greek people whether they are willing to cut their standard of living more, (austerity) in order to get a compromise with the Troika. What they were asked was, whether they want to compromise with their creditors? And overwhelmingly they say yes they do.

In a poll; ‘carried out by Kapa Research and is to be published in Sunday’s To Vima newspaper, found that 71.9 percent want an agreement with Greece’s creditors, against 23.2 percent who said the government should refuse any compromise.”

Of course if the Greek people are not willing to suffer through more austerity, there is nothing for them to give to their creditors and thus there is no basis for a compromise. Either the Greeks will pay their debts out of their standard of living today AND in the future, or they won’t.

The Greek people in the same poll back Syriza (the political party of Tsipras) by 15 points over any other party, and have full confidence in him to get the job of an impossible compromise done.

Living in delusion land, 84% of the Greek people want to continue to use the Euro, not thinking for a moment of what will happen when there are very few of them in circulation, (IE In their pockets) because the Troika has cut off funding to the country. And 75% of the Greek people want to remain a part of the Euro Zone as well. 

This is the same as the Greek people saying that they want everything they view to be good about living in the Euro and the Euro Zone without any of the bad and they want poor Alexis Tsipris to get it for them. The Greek people are willing to compromise, but not if it means any loss to their standard of living. Lots a luck Alexis.

In order to avoid a political melt down, Tsipras may need to cut the best deal he can get, which will mean giving up something and then taking it to the people for a referendum. But they don’t want that either. 60% of the Greeks are against a referendum. “Just get the money for us Alexis and remember we don’t want to give up any part of our standard of living. But we do want a compromise. You figure it out.”

Last week Tsipras managed to pay the 750 million Euros owed to the Troika by selling the nations reserves. All of this foolishness however was scheduled to hit the fan in June when Athens, (which has now sold its reserves) would have to cough up 1.5 billion more Euros.

Meanwhile the Dragon from the East has made its presence known. Speaking for Beijing, (which has the real cash) Russian President Vladimir Putin invited Greece to join the BRICS bank. This is more than an offer to be part of a bank. It is a de facto invitation for Greece to, (if not leave the Anglo American EU Empire) to at least put one of its feet among the rapidly forming group of nations that are standing economically, politically and even militarily against this Empire.

And Beijing always quiet on world events, has gently intervened and slapped the wrist of the EU, headlining in XinHua- Europe, (English edition); “Greece demands creditors’ consistency in debt deal negotiations”

Greece however is a part of NATO. Can Washington imagine a NATO member effectively aligning itself with China and Russia?

And Washington planners do understand that if Greece is broken economically, (even as Greek sheeple are in complete denial) that the country will drift into the BRICS, as it will have no other choice.

So today apparently, the president of the European Commission Jean-Claude Juncker, (Washington’s flunky in Europe) seems to be overriding Schäuble and Dijsselbloem, and is coming up with a plan of how to get enough money to Athens so it can pay its 1.5 billion Euro debt in June.

Since 60% of all of Greece’s debts are owed to Euro Zone countries, this means an incredible feat of bureaucratic slight of hand, or how to take 1.5 billion Euros out of one pocket of the Euro Zone, (or wherever you can get it) and then put a Billion back in another pocket, (and a 1/2 Billion for other creditors), while declaring a sort of victory.

All would agree then that that Greece is not bankrupt, so the IMF. ECB and EU don’t have to write off the debts and that “negotiations” are ongoing.

One of the best observers of our Alice in Wonderland financial world is Charles Hugh Smith. He has a great column here in which he postulates that while there is not likely to be any kind of meaningful financial agreement between Greece and the Euro Zone, that instead there well might be an agreement allowing both to continue to live in their own delusions.

Greece will somehow be barely kept afloat while all creditors will be allowed to keep Greek debts on their books as if all is going to end well, while negotiations will be ongoing and ongoing and ongoing……….

0 1131
A woman walks past a building decorated with a pair of eyes in the Crimean city of Sevastopol February 29, 2012. REUTERS/Stringer (UKRAINE - Tags: SOCIETY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)
Photo From

As readers of Red Pill Views know from Charlie Hebdo Part 1, and Charlie Hebdo Part 2, “Paris has been alternately supporting the Al Nusra Front, (Al Qaeda) in Syria in its attempts to overthrow the government in Damascus and was instrumental in supporting Al Qaeda in overthrowing Qaddafi in Libya, then after falling out with certain branches of Al Qaeda, France has sent troops to Mali to fight them there.”

All major Jihadi groups have been state sponsored, including ISIS and all flavors of Al Qaeda.  One major reason for the creation of Jihadis, has been so that they could start “terrorist” cells in the West, for the purpose of the colonization of Western people by the Mega Bankers and Corporations, which today control the main political parties in every Western Country, with the possible exception of Greece.

The goal of those families, (who own/ control the Mega Banks and Corporations) is to create a Global Government under their control. Through multilateral trade and legal agreements, Western countries have long since been ceding their sovereignty, little by little to synthetic transnational institutions and bureaucracies, (EU, ECB, UN, IMF, NAFTA, TPP ad tedium).

In order to create the mass support needed for a global government however, an event will have to be engineered, (false flag) of such power, that it will throw populations within nation states all over the world into chaos. And in so doing dramatize to citizens everywhere, that their governments are impotent to help them, because the problems are global.

Only then can the political flunkies of the Mega Banks and Corporations, call for a highly empowered global government (that would not only have the authority to solve the world’s problems, but also to create global institutions that would “prevent” future problems) and get mass support worldwide.

The problem for the global elites, is that when advanced societies are thrown into chaotic conditions,  where people lives rapidly deteriorate, what happens afterwards is not completely predictable. Such conditions also release pent up revolutionary elements from both the left and the right, especially among those who have read the signs properly and know and expect what is coming.

While the elites have taken control of standard media outlets, so that they effectively function only as propaganda instruments, the Internet has made it possible for millions today, to to one degree or another understand what is really happening in their world. Even with this downside for elites, the Internet is still worth it, because it is also the greatest mass surveillance tool ever created.

By allowing free speech and communication the Internet encourages potential enemies of the agendas of the elites, to come out of their closet, speak up and of course present themselves for dynamic, real time, computer monitoring and profiling. Once that happens it is simply a matter of being able to track and locate these people, so that when the catastrophic event or events take place, they can be surgically removed from society before doing harm, (spreading their ideas or leading a resistance).

But for citizens of Western countries to surrender what has been for them their traditional freedoms, it is necessary to engineer events that will generate fear in them, so that they will demand that their country becomes a surveillance state. And this is what Jihadis were designed to do.

Jihadi “terror” attacks like Charlie Hebdo or Garland, Texas are best done when there is already a large population of Muslim immigrants, as is true in France, but not Texas. While these immigrants are invariably not radicals, just ordinary people trying to find a better life for their families, they can be seen as potential radicals should the right circumstances be created.

Once groups like ISIS and Al Qaeda, who, (on again, off again) work with the CIA- Mossad, it really doesn’t matter which group triggers a “terror” attack, or even if it happens spontaneously, (one or two individuals acting out independently) due to the Anglo American Empire’s aggression in the MENA.

The results suit all of these groups who share a common need to use terror as a tool to take power.

So Charlie Hebdo served Al Qaeda by infuriating Europeans. That drove many to discriminate against, or even attack local Muslims and that in turn radicalizes them, creating more volunteers for Jihadis.

For the Mossad Charlie Hebdo strokes anti Islamic sentiment in the West, which in turn creates greater empathy and support for Israel.

And for the CIA- NSA, (US),  GCHQ, (UK) and DGSI (France), terror attacks means the ability to legally expand surveillance operations, AND coordinate that intelligence with other agencies and governments.

Now the other Charlie Hebdo shoe is falling in France, in which the people want their government to take their privacy rights away and surveil them, so as to “protect” them against future “terrorist” attacks.

The fact that none of this has anything to do with protecting people against terrorism and everything to do with the control of populations, is shown in this brilliant article by Tony Cartalucci who makes it clear that;

‘”As seen in nearly every recent terror attack both in Europe and North America including the ‘”Charlie Hebdo shooting'” and the more recent Garland, Texas attack, the alleged suspects behind the attacks all have one thread in common – they were all already under the watch of security agencies for years, some even imprisoned one or more times for terror-related and/or other violent offenses, some even having traveled overseas to fight alongside Western-backed terrorists in Syria, Iraq, and beyond.”

This is public information and should be enough for people in France or the US, to smell a rat and understand that surveillance police states are being created in their countries that have nothing to do with terrorism. Then these people can ask themselves the truly frightening question; “if not to protect against terrorism, why are these surveillance states really being created?”

This is a question that people in the West do not want to ask, because they do not want to think about the answer. The results of the masses of people in Anglo 5 and EU countries living in denial, will be the loss of both their freedom and sovereignty. That is called slavery.

0 1383
Photo From Xi and Putin Finding A Place For Greece

Greece is bankrupt. The bankers who control the Euro Zone want Greece out, but have no mechanism with which they can kick them out. What they want is for Greece to leave voluntarily after defaulting on its debts, which is going to happen sooner or later. Then the idea is to punish Greece as a bad and irresponsible debtor, as a warning to other debt enslaved peoples in Spain, Italy, Portugal, Ireland etc. as to what would happen to them if they ever thought of defaulting on their debts.

In the case of a default and with no Euros coming into the country, Greece will be forced to reintroduce its old currency the Drachma. This might create a host of beneficial effects for the country, such as reinvigorating its tourist and real estate industries. The way that the Euro Bankers will then seek to punish Greece, is by attacking the new currency, making it as worthless as possible and unusable outside of Greece.

The way that is done is by using highly leveraged financial markets to push the currency down, which the bankers did last year to the Russian Ruble. You can read about that here, in this three part series on”Economic Warfare”.

It does not take all that much money to destroy a currency because the Mega Banks on Wall Street and London use a ton of leverage. Leverage is gambling however, and it cuts both ways. If bigger and richer players come into the game with more real cash than you have and call your bluff, it is easy to lose everything.

So if the mega banks attack the new Greek Drachma through what amounts to leveraged bluffing, a friend with mega cash who can call their bluffs will quickly drive them out of the shark pool. And China, not Russia is the only country with the cash to do this. In fact by doing just this, it was Beijing that saved the Russian Ruble from the same type of attack at the beginning of this year.

That is why only China can save Greece. And here is a three part series explaining why it is in China’s interest to do so.  Because of all of this Red Pill Views has made it clear to the Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tispras, that he should have his principle negotiator and Finance Minister Yanis Varoufakis camped out in Beijing and waste minimum time with his intransigent Euro Group, (the Finance Ministers of the Euro Zone) adversaries. You cannot get blood out of a rock.

Since most of what happens in the world is not publicized, it is impossible to know whether the Chinese and the Greeks have been working together behind closed doors and if so what if any deal has been reached.

But yesterday two major events surfaced. The first predictable event is that the IMF, representing the Mega Banks has refused to give Greece any more help. That is because the Mega Banks, which Greece owes very little to, want Greece to go bankrupt and leave the Euro Zone, so they can begin to inflect pain on the Greek people.

But simultaneously the BRICS bank, (their alternative to the IMF) using Russia as the host has invited Greece to join. If Greece were to join the BRICS bank, it would come in as a nation needing cash, offering nothing to the assets originally put into it by Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa.

China is, in a class by itself the main player in all BRICS financial institutions. Russia is itself still stressing for cash, even as it gets past the worst of its own financial crisis. Moscow cannot be of much assistance to Athens. Only Beijing can. So Russia is in effect simply acting as a spokesman for China, in its invitation to Greece to join the BRICS Bank.

This is normal for China as to how it does its business. Beijing likes to stay in the background and use fronts for its operations.  An example is the Nicaraguan canal project estimated to cost over $40 billion, which is supposedly being fronted by a Chinese businessman who has only one or two billion.

By bringing Greece into the BRICS Bank, China is acting in the slow and methodical way that marks Beijing’s Geo Political strategies. Athens will ostensibly accept this opportunity to join the BRICS bank. It would be suicidal not to.

While this a huge step to help the Greeks to protect themselves against the bankers, (who have truly horrible plans in store for their future) it is only one step.

As long as Greece’s foreign debts remain in place, (unrepudiated) the nation is bankrupt. The BRICS Bank is after all a bank and not a welfare institution. So there is no way that, (given the present situation) the BRICS can loan Greece the money it needs to pay the interest on its debts with and expect to ever get that money back.

But what the BRICS Bank can do is act as a front for China to help Greece once Athens has done the heavy lifting and made itself solvent. There is only one way that can be done given that the Troika, (IMF, ECB and the EU) will not give Athens debt forgiveness and that is, (whatever words it will be called) debt repudiation. And that will force the reintroduction of the Greek Drachma.

When that happens the games will really begin. Before joining the BRICS Bank, Athens was going to have to face the wrath of the Mega bankers and the Euro Zone governments they control all alone. Now there is the hope that the Greek people will have many and powerful new friends taking their backs.

Photo From

The United Nations has reported that in 2014 there were more refugees, (both internal and cross border) than there have been since World War 2. About 18 million of them are cross border refugees, people trying to emigrate from their native land. A huge majority of these refugees have been fleeing from wars, directly or indirectly created by the United States, Britain, France, Turkey and Gulf States.

Around 2 1/2 million are from Afghanistan, a nation dismembered by George W. Bush and Tony Blair.

Another 2 1/2 million people have fled from Syria, a country that has been dismembered by the United States, Turkey, France and the Gulf States who have created, armed, trained, financed and given logistical support to every single anti government entity that initiated and are presently prosecuting that country’s civil war.

There are 1.2 million refugees from Somalia, a country devastated by the support of Washington and Riyadh for Al Shabaab,  Washington has done this in part for Geo Political reasons. That is that Somalia, like Yemen, (the new escalation of Washington’s regional wars) controls the shipping lanes to the Gulf of Aden leading into the Red Sea, where 3 1/2 million barrels of oil flow daily, mostly to Europe. Washington also knows that there is oil in Somalia, (the Puntland fields) and possibly a lot more off of its coast.

There is also another 635,000 refugees from the Sudan, a country the American have finished dismembering, creating a failed state called South Sudan. Again the reason was oil. South Sudan was the part of the Sudan where all the oil was. According to the World Bank; “South Sudan is the most oil-dependent country in the world, with oil accounting for almost the totality of exports”.

Another 1/2 million refugees are from the Democratic Republic of the Congo, (DRC). The DRC is the richest area of resources in Africa, with according to Forbes over $24 trillion in known “untapped deposits of raw mineral ores, including the world’s largest reserves of cobalt and significant quantities of the world’s diamonds, gold and copper.”

In Africa, Washington pits political, tribal, regional and religious factions against each other, giving money and weapons to whoever will best help it to maximize profits for its Multinationals. In the DRC that has led to this rich country being “the world’s least developed ………in terms of life expectancy, education, standard of living and key health indicators, like maternal and child mortality.” And Washington has helped to create and fund wars in that country that according to the International Committee of the Red Cross have killed more 5.4 MILLION people. 

Over the past 20 years of Washington instigated and fueled DNC wars, how much wealth has been extracted from the country by Anglo American and French transnationals and how much has gone to the people? The half million refugees from the DRC today, represent the continuation of this bleeding.

And then we have another 400,000 refugees from Iraq. George W. Bush and Tony Blair know well who destroyed their country.

The United Nations Commission on Refuges, (UNCR) from whom these figures come, do not count the 5 million Palestinian refugees, who have fled from the US and British backed conquest of their lands by European Zionists.

But the 17 million figure for international refugees given by the UNCR, pails compared to the 38 million who are internally displaced. That is people who have lost their homes and livelihoods and had to flee to an uncertain fate in a hoped for more peaceful part of their own country. The number of the internally displaced has soared by 11 million in 2014 alone, where 30,000 people every day became homeless. 

Among the new countries with soaring rates for internal displacement last year was Nigeria, with more than 1.5 million people. That has been due to Boko Haram, which is a CIA extortion racket again being done for oil. 

In Libya there are now 400,000 internally displaced, thanks to then French president Sarkozy, Obama and Hillary Clinton’s dismemberment of the country.

And now in the Ukraine there are now 1.2 million internally displaced thanks to Obama’s Maidan Square coup. And There are also 900,000 Ukrainians from the Southeastern Provinces of the country who have fled to Russia thanks to a Washington backed civil war in the country waged by its political puppets in Kiev.

These numbers are not even counted in the UNHR’s figure of 18 million refuges.

And now in 2015, since Washington and its vassal state Saudi Arabia are starting a war against Yemen, besides the dead, as a humanitarian crisis grows, the refuge problem both external and internal will also soar.

In the world of internally displaced people, the worst is still Syria at 7.6 million and Iraq 2.2 million. Those are both places where Obama and his stooges have done their very worst.

With the others wars, still in full swing and the new war in Yemen having only just begun, it would be a sure bet to say the number of refugees for 2015 will print significantly higher than this 2014 report.

Photo From  The Useful Idiots Of Global Elites

Continued from “Islamophobia And The Global Clampdown Part 2

Muslims however, overwhelmingly believe that violations of Sharia law should be punished. Of the peoples polled in the MENA, South Asia and Southeast Asia a large majority believed that stoning was an appropriate punishment for adultery. In Torah, (the early books of the Old Testament, also called “The Laws of Moses”) God too demanded a death sentence, (then by stoning) as the punishment for adultery. But few Christians or Jews would adhere to that today. And this would obviously be anathema in even Muslim European societies, (Albania, Bosnia etc), much less Britain, France or Germany.

In the MENA and South Asia, a majority, or near majority of those polled, believe in the death penalty for Muslims who wish to convert to another religion. In Europe beliefs such as this would be seen as the equivalent of a declaration of war by most Christians and their civil states, should a Euro Muslim wishing to covert to Christianity be attacked much less killed for his or her choice. Only a minority of Muslims in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Jordan, Iraq, Egypt, Lebanon and the Palestinian territories believe that honor killings, (the killing of a person, usually but not always a woman because they have dishonored their families typically over sexual issues) are never called for.  

And there have been no polls as to how many Muslims living in Christian Europe believe in a parallel Sharia legal system that would have its own enforcement arm, much less a belief that the stoning of adulterers, or the killing of converts, or honor killings is desirable. And there are no polls that I found anywhere as to public support, or lack of it among Muslims for female castration or the stoning of prostitutes.

So while moderate Muslims and their friends may say that very few people actually adhere to these ancient and barbaric concepts, others who are not Muslim friendly say that a strong and dangerous minority do.

Because official institutions, (other than Pew) have refused to do any studies, that does not make these potential problems go away. Not wanting to shed light on something that people are loathe to see, does not make it cease to exist. 

One main reason why the Jews failed so miserably in adapting to life in Europe, particularly from the 16th through the 18th century is because they wanted to live under Talmudic law, which in many ways also conflicts with local law. An extreme example is that under Torah God tells the Israelites that they cannot steal, but that all of the laws of Torah were given only to the Israelites, (sort of as a test group for human evolution) and that those laws do not yet apply to anyone other than the tribes of Israel.

This was enshrined in the Talmud. And many Jews who lived under that set of laws, believed that they could not cheat a fellow Jew, but it was OK to cheat a non Jew. This was not a recipe for popularity when Jews lived as a minority in a Christian or Muslim region.

Euro Muslims should consider the experience of Euro Jews very carefully, relative to their belief in Sharia and desire to live in Non Muslim Europe.

Today Islam is widely tolerated among the majority of people in countries like the UK, France and Germany where most have a favorable opinion of Muslims.  But as economies deteriorate and social institutions strain, expect that these numbers will lessen dramatically.

There is also the religious element. Christianity in Europe, as a real matter is dying. Few, especially under 50 years old identify themselves as practicing Christians. This has left a spiritual vacuum that, in good times is filled with consumerism and careerism. But in bad times, which is now effecting newly forming ghettos of despair, the lack of a common faith, (which acts as an adhesive for people and gives guidelines of how to live in bad times as well as good) has led to a poverty of the soul and spirit as well as social deterioration.

The clear symptoms of social degradation among poor Christians are crime, violence within the community and even in the home, drug and alcohol abuse and prostitution. Where marginalized Christians live side by side with Muslims, many will note that no matter how poor, practicing Muslims tend to have strong families and manage to minimize social ills. That is a great attraction for young Christians who are disgusted with the values of their nominally Christian neighbors, (and find no guidance in their faith), to convert to Islam. And as nothing is more fervent than the convert and especially among the young, many will be attracted to Islam’s more radical elements.

True Christians should thank their Muslim brethren for showing those who have lost their faith, (through example) a way to live, in harmony with the teachings of Christian, (as well as Muslim) scriptures. And the spiritual despair of impoverished and hopeless Christians, (as well as some who are in the middle class) and their attraction to Islam, should act as an alarm bell to Christian leaders that they are failing to adapt Christian teachings to the daily realities of their congregations.

But all too often Jingoist Christians, instead of thanking Muslims for warning Christian leaders that they are failing, will blame Muslims for stealing Christians through conversions. In other words they will blame Muslims for their successes in keeping strong families, living together in reasonable harmony and thus acting as a model for Christians.

In good economic times with an expanding pie for everyone, all of these problems might be avoided or minimized. But in the coming long and calamitous downturn, these religious problems and frequently deep divisions in values will exacerbate the general intolerance against especially Muslim immigrants.

 Even if we do not know exactly what the values are of Muslims in Christian Europe, given what the values are in countries from which they originated, there is every chance that large segments, (even if minorities) are going to be sympathetic to these values, (stoning for adulterers, the death penalty for conversion, honor killings etc.) which are anathema to present European values.

These segments of the Euro Muslim community even if not radical now, (IE violent) are the tinder that if carefully nurtured can create civil strife and along with grave economic pressures, chaotic conditions throughout Europe.

If you are an owner/ controller of the Mega Banks and Corps, (MB&C) who control the Empire, this is all to the good. Chaos for them is only a helpful breaking down of societies so that they can be restructured to their liking. The match to ignite the tinder is “terror” attacks by people perceived to be Muslims. This can come from of a lone individual spontaneously going berserk after a long history of economic and frequently social repression, or through an attack by long cultivated Jihadi groups, either acting on their own to radicalize Euro Muslims, or doing it as a favor for the CIA.

Or if no Muslim will perform a needed “terror’ attack, then the CIA- Mossad will do it for them in their name, as per 9/11.

No matter who would perform the terror attacks, the purpose will always be the same, to spur Islamophobia in Europe, which will then lead to greater and greater isolation and repression of Euro Muslims, which in turn will ignite the tinder of Islamic “radicalism” and spread ever more “terror” throughout Europe.

Then the political representatives of the MB&C, will tell the people’s of Europe that the only way to control Islamic “terrorism”, other than harming innocent Muslims, or letting a few crazies control immigration policy, is for them to sacrifice their privacy and civil liberties and allow their governments to erect all seeing all knowing police states in which all citizens will be monitored 24/ 7 with the data bases of each of them continuously updated along with their personality and character profiles. That way not only can terrorism be stopped, but so can child pornography and organized crime.

For the global elites, the Orwellian, techno- Fascist police state can be sold as a win- win to sheeple everywhere, including Muslims. That because the state will be able to easily weed out the “bad” ones, (as it will for non Muslims as well) leaving the good ones to the peaceful enjoyment of their faith and style of life.

Welcome to paradise.

Photo From 

The main theme from Part 1 of “Islamophobia & The Global Clampdown”is the plan of Global Elites to create a global government using three main prongs. In the Anglo 5 + Eu it is to create absolute population control in all knowing, all seeing surveillance police states. Against major countries like China a Russia the goal is to dismember the countries and create regime change. And in other countries where Washington, considers the country or its leadership unacceptable, it is to create the Empire of Chaos. “Radical Islam” is seen to be a tool that can help to accomplish all of this.

In the West and particularly in Europe the ambiance that will make this achievable is economic disintegration. And unless there is some out of the box miracle coming, Greece is only the canary in the coal mine. The economic future, (the main trend) of the EU nations, and all of Europe is bleak. Those who own/ control the Mega Banks & Corps, (MB&C) globally have given the Europeans permission to devalue the Euro. And that is helping exports, (and thus particularly Germany). But this is only a short term fix. The problems of Europe and the EU are structural, too much debt, too little economic growth to pay these debts and weak banks.

To the degree that European economies weaken, unskilled and semi skilled workers become a permanent underclass and social safety nets erode,  xenophobia will grow and snowball. This will not just be against Muslims, but against all immigrants and legal workers from poor EU nations like Romania and Bulgaria, as well as illegal workers from these countries and countries like the Ukraine.

But the situation will be worse for Muslims, not just immigrants but also first generation and even second generation nationals of Euro countries. This will be exacerbated by not just their numbers, but the economic and educational levels of Muslims in Europe. In the US there have been few problems even as the country is importing around 100, 000 Muslims annually. Muslims are still well less than 1% of the population in the US and their profile as to education and income is average among Americans. In other words, even though there may be people who dislike or distrust Islam, Muslims in America are not an oppressed minority.

It is strange and suspect that in the highly polarized environment within Europe, relative to Islam few polls have been taken, (at least available in the English language).

Informally it seems that most Euro Muslims were, (along with other immigrant groups) imported to do unskilled and semi skilled labor. While I have no data to support this, (data welcomed by readers) I would guess that Euro Muslims have much lower educational levels and skill sets than locals do. Moreover with Europe’s public educational systems under financial stresses that will only worsen, upward mobility for second generation low skilled immigrants will be difficult.

Among all immigrant groups however Muslims are the least likely to be able to easily integrate within Euro Cultures. The primary reason for this is Sharia law, which means Islamic law. Christianity does not have, (within its Biblical texts) a comprehensive legal system. Judaism has within the Old Testament, particularly in what is referred to as the “Laws of Moses”, or what the Jews call Torah, laws prescribed by God. But they are not comprehensive. The Jews did create a post Biblical comprehensive set of laws in the Talmud. But few Jews live under Talmudic law today.

In Holy Qu’ran however God creates not just a theology for Muslims but a complete legal system and a way of life. It is this that is referred to as Sharia. And pretty much all practicing Muslims will believe in it, because it is integral to their faith.

In a hallmark study Pew Research, (the best and least political of polling institutions) did a study on Sharia law and Global Islam. It found that in the Middle East- North Africa, (MENA) and in Sub Saharan Africa the vast majority of Muslims favored Sharia law to be the law of their country. But many Muslim countries who have a civil legal system, allow Sharia as a parallel legal system, (run informally through the mosques) for family law and property disputes. All polled nationals in the Muslim countries of Central Asia, Southeast Asia, South Asia and the MENA wanted at the least, such a parallel legal system.

The potential problem with parallel legal systems is that all legal systems must have a means of enforcement. What happens when an enforcement arm of Sharia law. through the Mosques, conflicts with a nation’s civil law? To the degree that dual legal systems function in Muslim nations, the Civil system must be constructed to make allowances for the Sharia system. But that is not going to happen in non Muslim nations.

In non Muslim Europe any informal Sharia legal system, cannot have any enforcement arm beyond the social ostracism of those believed to have broken its laws.

Part 3 of “Islamophobia & The Global Clampdown is coming tomorrow.

Photo From German Anti Islamic Movement Pegida. Soon Coming To Countries Near You

Those who own/ control the Mega banks- Corporations, (MB&C) have a plan, that is an integrated, flexible framework for global control ending in a global government.

The primary form of global “terror” is Imperialism, today the purview of the Anglo American Empire, ((First tier Anglo 5+ Israel, second tier Western Europe + Japan + the rest of North America, (minus Cuba and Nicaragua) third tier South Korea, Taiwan, the Philippines, Colombia, Chile, much of Eastern Europe and most of the MENA, (The Gulf States, Egypt, Morocco, Jordan, Tunisia, Algeria etc.)). On the fourth tier might be a few sub-Saharan African countries like Rwanda as well as Afghanistan.

This Empire is run out of Washington, (political and military) and New York and London, (financially). All of it works as an integrated whole for the subjugation of all humanity and most importantly including the peoples of their own countries, especially the Americans.

Where there are major sovereign nations that the Anglo American Empire cannot control, such as Russia and China they look to dismember these countries with the view of regime change,  the installation of puppet rulers in the place of those who presently rule.

When the lieutenants of the Anglo American Empire cannot do that, (or sometimes even if they can) they intentionally create the Empire of Chaos. That is happening now in many part of the ME, Central Asia and throughout much of Africa. This is because broken divided nations are weak and chaos can at times be useful. Over time however, people everywhere hate chaos and long for order. And that is exactly the order that those who will put together a global government intend to give to them.

The Jihadis of the MENA and Central Asia were all created, funded, armed, trained and given logistical support by Washington, the Gulf States and Turkey. With secondary support from Israel, Jordan, France and the UK.  All parties involved were, at least in part in it for their own purposes which occasionally conflicted. Sometimes when Jihadis get their hands on resources and independent financing, (as ISIS has done) they break out, into at least partially having their own agendas.

While the Empire has long used mercenaries to create regime change, it is Obama who has made this the centerpiece of his Geo Political and military policies. There are two reasons why Washington has created Jihadis. The smaller reason is that, although Washington has in the past worked constructively with Iran, (most notably in Afghanistan and Iraq), it does not like, nor trust the regime in Tehran. In the MENA Iran is the ONLY fully independent and sovereign Muslim state.

Sunni Jihadis in the Levant were created to circumscribe and limit Tehran’s regional influence. That is why ISIS, no matter how rebellious must be nurtured. Just like Tehran its power must be circumscribed as well, to create a balance of sectarian hatreds in the Levant.

The greatest reason for the creation of Jihadis, however is so that they can used as useful idiots to create an all seeing all knowing police state in the countries of Empire, particularly in the US. Those who own/ control the Anglo American Empire need a free hand, (with no push back at their base) to engineer and manufacture the global government. And in order for that to happen they must have absolute control of their populations, particularly that of the Americans.

For that to happen people within Empire must be willing to voluntarily cede what is left of their sovereignty and civil liberties. And the driver that will get them to do that is FEAR!!! Those who own/ control the MB&C have been extremely successful in creating a nation of fear and repression in the United States. And we are only in the beginning of this process.

The US, the UK and Israel are evolving into the models, (eventually for the world) of an all seeing, all knowing police state with each citizen under 24 hour computerized surveillance, with constantly updated data bases and profiling. If that seems a bit far fetched, remember the words of the the great hockey player Wayne Gretzky, who said; “skate to where the puck is going to be, not where it has been”.

If Washington and London don’t have that kind of control quite yet, those who own/ control the Anglo American Empire intend to bring it in much, much sooner than even those who have the least trust in government will be able to imagine. But then again what about citizen push- back? It is the job of Jihadi “terror” campaigns to minimize that.

The majority of Sunni Muslims of the MENA and Central Asia have been repressed, controlled. impoverished, kept ignorant and beaten down since the days of colonialism, (which have not ended) 100 years ago. This is now fermenting great anger against the Anglo American Empire, among many who understand what has happened to their people and what is still happening. These are the perfect recruits for “terror” campaigns against Western targets.

Meanwhile in the global economy, we are entering a period when much of human labor is going to become redundant. That because of robotic production facilities with embedded 3D printing. This will create massive unemployment in Western economies, and create labor supply pressures that will lower the wage bases of most while dismantling social safety nets. Downward mobility will be more common than upward mobility.

This trend is so new in the prosperous countries of the Empire, that most citizens, (just as in the early ’30s) want to believe that it is a temporary phenomenon. That things will improve soon. They won’t. That is because unlike the ’30s the problems are deeply structural, based on un- payable levels of global debt, ($200 Trillion) and a debt trap in which more and more debt is needed to be taken on by citizens directly, or through their governments, for lower and lower levels of global growth.

Into this mix, those who own/ control the MB&C are pouring a great deal of immigrant labor, (legal and illegal) most of which is redundant upon arrival. That is they are willing to bid for the jobs of locals at much lower wages, or being the cat’s paw for forcing the wage base lower especially for unskilled and semi skilled labor.

Where immigrants don’t technically take local jobs, it is because they are willing to work for sub standard wages. That creates a labor pool in which industries in Western countries, that only need low skilled workers are created for their exploitation. Whereas if very cheap immigrant labor didn’t exist, such industries would have to be outsourced. Internal industries would have to be able to meet the much higher wage base demands of a much smaller and therefor more empowered local labor force. To be profitable such industries would need higher skilled labor. That in turn would keep pressure on governments for affordable educational systems and allow for upward mobility. Mass immigration kills all of this.

In both the United States and in Europe there is a massive push back against this flooding of the labor market. But in much of Europe the immigrants have also been Muslims. It is no accident that they have been imported at the exact time when the banking Empire known as the EU, (as it is presently constructed) is slated to fall apart, which will leave endless debts and economic chaos in its wake.

So Muslims as well as other immigrants will find labor markets, in which at best they will have to work for low wages, frequently taking jobs away from locals, who respond with anti immigrant or specifically anti Muslim sentiments. These immigrants will be thrown into new ghettos, where as cheap disposable labor they will have few few avenues of advancement and be more and more stuck as a permanent underclass, which has existed for years in the United States.

Tomorrow “Islamophobia & The Global Clampdown Part 2


Arman Matthews